🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.